For consumer goods companies with omnichannel sales, downstream demand is a key signal to guide inventory allocation, new product launches, demand planning, and other decisions. However, not all downstream demand is created equal.
To minimize lost sales due to out-of-stocks, companies must measure against true demand. But what is true demand, and why is it so important? We had the opportunity to give a presentation on this topic at the TPA Supply Chain Conference alongside Procter & Gamble (P&G) Customer Supply Chain Manager, Ula Iriarte, and Ahold-Delhaize USA Director of Replenishment, Ashley MacLearn. In this post, we’ll highlight some of the key points we discussed.
At a high level, measuring true demand is important because it helps reduce lost sales that stem from out-of-stocks. As an illustration, imagine that a shopper comes to Food Lion in Mount Holly, North Carolina. She intends to purchase Crest 3D White toothpaste, but finds that the store is out-of-stock.
Past studies have estimated that lost sales are generally equivalent to about 4% of revenue.
She may decide to purchase a different brand’s whitening toothpaste instead, which would be revenue lost for Crest’s parent company, P&G. Or, she may decide to make the trip to a neighboring Target, where the Crest is in stock. That would be revenue lost for Food Lion’s parent company, Ahold-Delhaize. In both scenarios, the stock-out has led to a lost sale. Across all shoppers, both consumer goods companies and the retailers they sell through are impacted.
For this reason, both parties are incentivized to work together to use true demand for inventory management. It helps ensure consumers can purchase the products they want, when and where they want them.
So, lost sales because of out-of-stocks are clearly a real issue. But just how big of a problem is it for the collective retail ecosystem? As it turns out, it’s a very expensive problem.
According to data from Progressive Grocer Magazine, there are 38,571 supermarkets in the United States that exceed $2M in annual sales, and they do about $682.7B in total revenue. Past studies have estimated that lost sales are generally equivalent to about 4% of revenue — in this case, that would be $27.3B. If we can prevent even a fourth of lost sales by decreasing out-of-stocks, that would amount to an extra $6.8B in revenue every year, and that’s just for grocery stores!
The key to recouping this revenue is the difference between generic demand and “true demand.” Tracking for true demand means thinking about demand at the individual consumer level — shifting from “filling orders” to “filling shelves.” This granular approach is different from typical supply chain management that stops tracking at the distribution center or other higher levels. Demand at the DC is just a proxy for true demand.
In our experience, several obstacles stand in the way of companies hoping to measure true demand.
Companies might also wonder if such granularity really makes enough of a difference to be worth the investment. Based on working with clients across a number of industries, we’ve found the answer to be a resounding “yes!”. Here are three situations where the lack of access to true demand can get you in trouble.
For examples of how each of these problems impact store in-stock rates, please download our white paper “True Demand: The Difference Between Assuming and Knowing”.
An overview of the benefits of a shared supply chain control tower, what it should include, and questions to determine if your company should invest...
Keep readingBest practices for conducting cohort analysis to evaluate the ROI of new and historical marketing and sales events
Keep readingWith experience at both companies, Brian shares thoughts on how they compare and why Alloy gives customers the edge in supply chain management
Keep reading
