When building demand forecasts for consumer goods, there’s a variety of algorithms you can use. Ranging from longstanding best practices to cutting-edge methodologies, they all ultimately use historical data to try to predict future demand for sales and supply chain management. The complexity, assumptions and types of data inputs used in a given model type — and how they are weighted — will vary, but the basic ingredients are similar across the board.
So with all these choices, it can be difficult to know which methodology will work best for your products. In this post, we’ll review three different classes of commonly used modeling methods to give a sense of where each really shines, as well as tradeoffs to keep in mind.
Historical average models smooth out demand by taking averages over different historical periods. This is one of the simplest classes of forecasting models and tends to work well for long-term or high-level demand planning, where basic trends over time are most important to understand and the daily or weekly variation can be de-emphasized.
Pros: The primary advantage of a historical average model over other methodologies is its simplicity; you can easily implement this type of model with almost any tool, including Excel and Tableau. That makes it relatively easy to compare results in different systems or debug calculation errors.
Cons: Historical averages are anchored to their previous periods and react to changes slowly. They are also overly responsive to outliers in the data because they do not use regressors.
Example model types: Simple Moving Averages, Holt-Winters Exponential Smoothing
Best for: Products with low forecastability. These products may be regularly sold, but have low daily/weekly volume, so intermittent demand isn’t easily predicted and improving the forecast doesn’t add a lot of value. You can also use these methods for high-level budgeting and planning, since short-term and seasonal variations are smoothed out.
This class features regression models that are fit by comparing different historical time periods. These models can also incorporate other inputs, such as price promotions, seasonality and weather patterns.
Pros: Models in this class are especially adept at predicting products that have consistent variation, such as established seasonality trends. These models can also take into account additional factors known to influence demand, such as promotional and price activity.
Cons: Regression models expect consistent variation in the data, which means that datasets with a limited history force the model to make a fit on too few data points. You must inspect the time series for proper assumptions, such as stationarity and homoscedasticity. You also need to scale and pre-select regressors to prevent issues like multicollinearity.
Example model types: Seasonal ARIMAX, Generalized Additive Models
Best for: Products with well-defined seasonality or changes in demand, e.g., swimsuits and winter coats, and products for which the effects of promotional activity can be easily captured using regressors.
Machine learning models are a broad set of methodologies that use more complex mathematical techniques to select variables and optimize fit where there may be complicated interactions between features. These can be powerful choices, but you’ll want to make sure these obey the integrated, transparent and actionable properties described in our white paper.
Pros: These types of models are great for discovering non-linear and complex relationships in your data, without needing to preselect the exact model type or make assumptions about external factors. Instead of explicitly weighting variables or variable interactions, many of these methods allow you to determine variable importance without worrying about the effects of multicollinearity.
Cons: The challenge with machine learning is it requires a lot of input data and a fair amount of investment in setup and maintenance. The results of these types of models can also be more complicated to interpret correctly and can be prone to overfitting.
Example model types: Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Machines, Neural Networks (LSTM-RNN, CNN) Support Vector Machine
Best for: Products sold widely and very frequently that may have nuanced buying patterns given the scope and volume of sales.
While the increased complexity of AI/ML models can yield more accurate demand forecasts in some cases, tradeoffs in the difficulty of implementation mean that the nuances of your products determine which model will yield the best results for you. So, how do you go about choosing the right model, or set of models, for your business?
Weighing each model’s pros and cons is a start, but your products might not neatly fit into a single type. To work around this limitation, it’s also possible to build an ensemble model, which takes models from multiple different classes and averages across them. This approach has the benefit of incorporating effects generated from each of methodology; similar effects are strengthened, while inconsistent effects are canceled out.
Brick-and-mortar retail remains key to the toy industry, but challenges brands trying to understand demand and align inventory. We share best practices to overcome them.
Keep readingHow to take an iterative approach to digital supply chain transformation with real-time alerts that motivate teams to collaborate on issue resolution
Keep readingIn a Supply Chain Now webinar, Alloy's CEO defines downstream demand, why it’s important and how brands can efficiently use POS data to their advantage
Keep reading
